ILL MET BY MOONLIGHT is a 1957 film based on an actual incident during the German occupation of the island of Crete in World War II. It was the last film written, produced, and directed by Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger for their production company The Archers.
The movie details the activities of two British officers in the SOE, Patrick Leigh Fermor (Dirk Bogarde) and Bill Moss (David Oxley). Fermor is known as "Philedem" among the Greek resistance fighters he assists on the island of Crete. Fermor comes up with a bold idea to kidnap German General Kreipe (Marius Goring), get him off the island, and transport him to the British base in Cairo. Fermor and Moss manage to capture the General with help from various locals, but they still have to transport him through difficult terrain to the coast, while evading thousands of German soldiers searching for them.
Being that this is a Powell-Pressburger movie, one shouldn't expect ILL MET BY MOONLIGHT to be a typical WWII adventure--and it isn't. Dirk Bogarde and David Oxley are not hard-bitten tough guys--they're both understated and droll. At times the duo seem more like a couple of mischievous fellows pulling off a prank than two agents attempting a wartime mission. One even wonders if the mission is that important in the first place--Fermor states that it will cause embarrassment for the Germans throughout Greece, but will it actually affect anything to do with the occupation itself?
As usual with Powell and Pressburger, there's plenty of quirky story and editing choices. One main plot element is the difference between the colorful natives and the very British Fermor and Moss. There is a notable attempt to inject some local atmosphere into the tale, particularly with Mikis Theodorakis' music score. The brutality of the German occupation of the Greek islands is hinted at, but not really touched upon in a major way.
The main German character in the film, General Kreipe, is also portrayed unexpectedly. He's not a ranting & raving Nazi buffoon--Marius Goring plays him as an intelligent, well-mannered man who quietly tries to take advantage of his situation. General Kreipe and his British captors even wind up having a mutual respect for each other at the end of the film.
Among the supporting members of the cast are Christopher Lee in a small role as a German officer (Lee gets killed off right after he shows up), and Michael Gough, who is almost unrecognizable as a Greek resistance fighter. David McCallum makes his film debut here (I didn't spot him), and it needs to be mentioned that David Oxley was the evil Hugo Baskerville in Hammer Films' version of THE HOUND OF THE BASKERVILLES.
While watching ILL MET BY MOONLIGHT for the first time last night, I was convinced the outdoor scenes had been filmed in either Crete or Greece. They weren't--the location shooting was in France and Italy. The hills and mountains that were used are visually spectacular, even in black & white. (Another WWII film made by Powell and Pressburger a few years earlier, THE BATTLE OF THE RIVER PLATE, was in color, and more epic in scope.)
Apparently neither Michael Powell or Emeric Pressburger were happy with how ILL MET BY MOONLIGHT turned out. The duo had disagreements with the Rank Organization (which financed the film) and each other. I liked the movie, but it must be said that it's not a hard-hitting action-packed story. There's a fair amount of suspense in whether the British officers can get away with their German prize, but the tone of the film is almost whimsical at times.
One other thing that needs to be touched upon--the movie was titled NIGHT AMBUSH in America. I can understand the title change, since ILL MET BY MOONLIGHT (which is a line from Shakespeare) sounds more fitting for a romantic melodrama. But why pick such a generic title like NIGHT AMBUSH??

Whatever happened to David Oxley? He had such a striking presence. I thought his Hugo Baskerville was effective.
ReplyDeleteOxley died in 1985, but I understand he'd retired from acting about ten years earlier. I don't know why; he died from a stroke aged 65, perhaps he'd had health problems that stopped him acting. I thought his Baskerville was very good.
ReplyDeleteOxley certainly got the Hammer version of Baskerville off to a roaring start.
DeleteI must be honest, I actually find him more frightening than the hound! It is also a nice attention to detail, that when he sees the unseen hound, the demonic hound happens to terrify a demon in human form. He is probably aware that the things he did are terrible but not believing in God, and relishing in his misdeeds, make a jab about the hounds of hell taking him. He sees an actual hellhound coming for him like a vengeful wraith, his eyes widening with real shock, and him shaking his head in disbelief "No. No." as he is unable to fanthom that he is seeing an actual hellhound before him, and his eyes widen in pure terror as the hound approaches him, as he realizies that he's damned for all the evil he's done, finally letting out the last sound being an actual scream of terror; I think it is no coincidence that when Hugo meets his well-deserved fate to the hound, he drops the dagger, instead of using it to defend himself against the hound, instead shielding his face with his hands. As his final sane thought comes into his head, he realises that the hound, being a ghost dog, cannot be injured or killed. In a way, his shielding his face is almost like a mixutre of sudden shame (as if suddenly realising how evil he himself has fallen) and fear (as if he is now seeing the gates of Hell opening up for him); even his blood cludding screams turn into a gurgle as we hear the hound chewing nosily, as if it is inflicting pain on him in his last moments on Earth, before it takes him to the next world. Having the hound itself not be shown is so good, since a) the fake hound the Stapleons uses is not really effective on screen, and b) we can imagine the actual hellhound however we see it in our own minds' eye that way, and no one has to feel like "that's not what I always thought the hellhound looked like!"
Delete