Sunday, March 3, 2024

DUNE (Part Two)

 








The second part of Denis Villeneuve's mammoth screen adaptation of Frank Herbert's famous novel is a true serious science-fiction/fantasy epic, and a welcome respite from the many Marvel clones clogging up today's theaters. 

DUNE Part Two deals with Paul Atreides (Timothee Chalamet) becoming a leader of the Fremen race on the planet of Arrakis, and using these people as warriors against those who destroyed his family and his legacy. Part Two also introduces characters such as the Emperor of the Universe (Christopher Walken), his daughter Princess Irulan (Florence Pugh), Lady Fenring (Lea Seydoux), and the psychopathic Feyd-Rautha (Austin Butler). 

The main advantage that Villeneuve has is the time (and the budget) to closely adapt Herbert's sprawling saga. In the 1984 DUNE, it seemingly takes Paul a few minutes to unite the Fremen under his banner. Here Paul's journey is much more complicated, with even his lover Chani (Zendaya) worried about what he will do with the power that he covets. 

DUNE Part Two isn't a tidy tale about good and evil. As I've stated before, Paul Atreides is more Anakin Skywalker than Luke. Part Two deals with such elements as religious fundamentalism, military insurgency, and the danger of giving oneself completely over to charismatic leaders. 

In DUNE Part One I felt that Jason Momoa as Duncan Idaho made the biggest impression. In Part Two, it's Javier Bardem as Fremen chieftain Stilgar, but the cast is excellent overall. I had some worries about whether the baby-faced Timothee Chalamet could properly portray the "chosen one" version of Paul, but he did much better than I expected. (It needs to be pointed out that the character arc of Paul would be a major challenge to any actor.) 

The major reason that this new DUNE saga is effective is the rich visual qualities it possesses. As in Part One, Villeneuve, cinematographer Greig Fraser, and the entire production team create a fully-fledged  universe that is believable, impressive, and intriguing. There are plenty of breathtaking shot compositions here, but they are smoothly integrated into the story being told--they're not just an example of the filmmakers showing off. 

DUNE Part Two might be even better than Part One. Together the films form a 5+ hour spectacular that presents how classic science-fiction should be adapted for the big screen. Denis Villeneuve hasn't just done a great service for Frank Herbert's novel, he's done a great service for 21st Century genre cinema. 

5 comments:

  1. I've been hearing mostly positive things about this film. But tonight, one of my Youtube contacts filmed a quick reaction video as he came out of the theater, and he was livid. He said the movie strayed far from the book, specifically with the character of Chani. But I'm glad to hear you enjoyed it. It seems to be getting folks back in the theaters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There are some differences from the book, especially toward the climax. I think that was mainly done to set up a third film. But if your friend was mad at that, I can imagine what he thought of the other adaptions!

      Delete
  2. Well, he just posted a 29 minute video entitled DUNE EMASCULATED, so I guess I'll find out!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That sounds like the title of one of those novels Frank Herbert's son writes continuing the series!

      Delete
  3. Glad to hear the positives. Enjoyed the first part and this one seems suitably epic.

    ReplyDelete